Phenom

Discussion in 'Gaming' started by .ZERO, Nov 24, 2007.

  1. .ZERO

    .ZERO Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    2,220
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    May 28, 2006
    Location:
    #gamerenders
    just wondering peoples opinions if AMD's new quad cores are worth the money or would it be better to stick with my dual core 4200?
     
  2. xlink

    xlink GR's Tech Enthusiast

    Posts:
    8,054
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2004
    the way I see it is simple

    it can't definitively outperform intel's one year old quads at this point.
    if you're looking into getting a quad, it's about the same cost to go for a q6600 + board and you'll be abel to voerclock that for notably bettter performance.


    as it is, phenom on average is 10% SLOWER per GHz than Core 2 and it doesn't clock as well.

    HUGE disappointment to me. I was hoping to get one so I coudl stick with my DDR2 for a while longer. I was hoping phenom would be competitive with nehalem (intel's next chip likely called Core 3 due out in Q4 08, it's allready taped out too.)

    now I'll likely just end up getting a 'cheap' dual core penryn, overclocking the sucker to hell, and holding out on it until it fries or I get fedup with performance and I buy a new system altogether and/or a then cheap quad.
     
  3. inverse

    inverse Banned from GR

    Age:
    35
    Posts:
    3,445
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Location:
    New Zealand
    As Xlink said, it's too behind Intel's offerings and cheap enough to be worth buying.

    I'd take a high end C2D over it any day.
     
  4. Marforce

    Marforce Senior Member

    Age:
    38
    Posts:
    1,344
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 1, 2005
    Location:
    Canada
    The only thing that may save it is the supposed unlocked edition. If this thing turns out to be a crazy overclock (to this point it has not) then I can see buying it. However, it is ~13% slower than the Q6600 but it is conveniently priced around ~13% less.
     
  5. xlink

    xlink GR's Tech Enthusiast

    Posts:
    8,054
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2004
    I'll be blunt, fi AMD prices it right i'll buy it. but I'm not seeing that happen. yields are too low. eve if they charge like mad, they don't have the stock in hand nor the capacity to generate much more and as such they'll eb chargin high because inevitably some WILL need/want it. Phenom looks to be an excellent chip for server and supercomputer use.

    I'm not running a server.

    For the record, I'm hoping that the next revision of the chip is better. I'm heard AMD's 65nm process basicalyl sucks and AMD is looking to ramp up on 45nm in 08, so it might help greatly. IF 45nm phenom can scale to 4Ghz on lowend air cooling(inte's next gen chip penryn can) and it offers close performane/clock and is comeptatively priced... I"ll buy. Heck I HATE THE INTEL FSB SYSTEM. Never as stable or good as the HTT bus.I'll tolerate it but I'd prefer not to.
     

Share This Page