Need a new good Processor

Discussion in 'Gaming' started by .sXe, Jun 3, 2007.

  1. .sXe

    .sXe Senior Member

    Posts:
    420
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2006
    Right now I'm running on -

    Processor: Intel Core 2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13GHz
    GFX Card: nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS
    RAM: 2046MB RAM
    PSU: Intel atx12v 550W
    Optical Drive: DVD±RW Dual Layer
    Hard Drive: 2x 250GB Serial ATA II
    Sound Card: Realtek HD Audio rear output
    Keyboard: Logitech G15
    Mouse: Logitech G5
    Monitor: Dell 22" 1680*1050


    And what else might I need?
     
  2. Echomander

    Echomander Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    525
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2005
    Location:
    Outer Space, where else? UK
    Why do you want a new processor now? That one is fairly good, and it might not be wroth it right now.
     
  3. arbiter2005

    arbiter2005 Well-Known Member

    Age:
    34
    Posts:
    1,012
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2005
    Location:
    England, Hull
    You after a better dual core or you after quad core?
     
  4. Coolguy

    Coolguy Well-Known Member

    Age:
    115
    Posts:
    1,997
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2005
    Location:
    New York City
    you could always get a quad core, another gig of ram if your running windows 32-bit or 2 more gb or ram if you have 64-bit.. not sure about the psu
     
  5. xlink

    xlink GR's Tech Enthusiast

    Posts:
    8,054
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2004
    I'd get a new motehrboard first.

    Gigabyte DS4.

    then run your CPU at say 3.2Ghz(50% faster)
     
  6. .sXe

    .sXe Senior Member

    Posts:
    420
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2006
    I thought it was the same thing ^_^
     
  7. xlink

    xlink GR's Tech Enthusiast

    Posts:
    8,054
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2004
    a processor is different than a motherboard.

    and a CPU running at 150% of stock is not the same as the CPU at stock.
     
  8. ewok`s3

    ewok`s3 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    I wouldnt change anything, and definatly dont change your motherboard and/or your processor without changing drive, I made the same mistake with my dad's computer and I spend 3 hours with microsoft support reactivating windows... you have a really nice machine, but you cant overclock an intel chip, seriously. A motherboard wont change processor speed, it just changes compatibility of hardware.

    Rich kids these days.
     
  9. alexd

    alexd Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    136
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 20, 2007
    I wudn't bother changing it tbh, pretty dam decent as it is. Up to you though if you have the money go for it.
     
  10. Blooper008

    Blooper008 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,535
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2005
    Your CPU is fine, depending on your motherboard I'd switch to the new P35 series of gigabyte/asus. The new DS3/4 gigabyte's are doing great.
     
  11. xlink

    xlink GR's Tech Enthusiast

    Posts:
    8,054
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2004
    you can overclock intel CPUs...

    trust me on that.

    Mine is running 50% faster(and can easily do up to 60% faster) than stock. Atleast under XP 32bit. with 64 bit extensions enabled the additional stress on my systems northbridge is a bit excessive and I can only do 350FSB.


    For the record I'm not really all that rich(OK I'm the sole inheritor of around 5 million dollars but that's not until a few relatives die) I live a fairly middle class life(perhaps a bit below middle class, my family lives a good deal below their means)


    I have a job.
     
  12. ewok`s3

    ewok`s3 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    I think you have AMD and Intel processors confused, AMD works on x64 whereas intel works on x32. Intel cannot be made to go to x64 whereas AMD cannot be made to x32... the simple truth is that it is not possible to overclock an intel CPU because the hardware cannot take excessive stress to the memory and FSB. AMD has 64 channels in which memory can travel where 32 channels (x32) can only handle 32. Intel can only handle 4 gigs of memory whereas AMD can take 8 gigs.
     
  13. xlink

    xlink GR's Tech Enthusiast

    Posts:
    8,054
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2004
    things to note

    one AMD and intel have cross lisencing agreements. Pretty much as soon as one camp can reverse engineer the other's advancements they can use it - as such intel has been using 64bit extensions for a few years now. Admittedly though AMD's implementation is a better implemented.

    I'm running in a 64 bit OS as we speak. With an Intel CPU.

    And my system is overclocked. The only bottlneck to my overclock is my systems northbridge, NOT my CPU and not my memory. CPU is running on an undervolt. Memory is capable of running a fair deal faster as well(DDR2-800 3-3-3 is doable)
    [​IMG]


    other things to note. having a 64bit register(x86-64) does not give you more channels through which to run memory, it just increases the working data size over 32bit(x86-32)

    Furthermore, Intel systems can handle well in excess of 16GB and AMD systems can handle well in excess of 16GB as well. The capacity to handle memory is largely chipset limited.

    read up a little.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X64

    after that, stop listening to your friend who "taught" you all this, he doesn't know much.
     
  14. ewok`s3

    ewok`s3 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Thats a software clocking, not a hardware clock...
     
  15. xlink

    xlink GR's Tech Enthusiast

    Posts:
    8,054
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2004
    do you want me to take a picture of my BIOS screen?

    it's set under BIOS.

    changing the operating frequency at which the system physically boots at through from ware is usually not considered to be software overclocking.

    by those standards AMD systems haven't been purely hardwareclockable since the palermino days when people bridged circuits for multiplier modification - BUT people still overclocked the buss speed through BIOS.

    if you want true hardware level overclocking , go back to the Intel 8086 days when you physically had to swap the clock crystals.

    motherboards made in the last 10 years or so no longer contain clock crystals as everything is synchronized with the systems chipset.
     

Share This Page