The one you wanted to rate is about a 6. Not bad but needs... something. The rest of them are good. 8/10 8/10 9/10.
Im going to give you an overall 3 for creativity because there are tuts out the rear end for those sigs and the all follow the same pattern. And execution you get a 4 because you stayed in the lines and followed directions. So 3+4=7 out of a possible 20 points 7/20 is your score.
7 - liked your other one better, Too many in-ter-mediate(why is intermediate_censored?) values for a b/w IMO, nice effects and good flow and real nice lighting, just overall nothing impressive. Rate plz:
6 7-7.5 Text could use work, the second one is nice. Not that it affected my rating, but I'd change the border.
7 for both. Love text on first one. Sorry but I can't really tell what you did. Just looks like some stocks with a couple effects to me. If you want some real c&c PM me the stocks. If anything, please C&C my first tag in my sig. Thanks.
7 6 I appreciate the fact that you're a default only, but the style is dull IMO (mine two currents are defaults btw) There's no need to avoid certain techniques for the hell of it, I say whatever'll end up looking best works. Here are the stocks http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v702/vettAs/1178558637.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v702/vet...H_Landscape.jpg
Oh, well that that is much better. The effects on the render are good. At first I thought they were part of the stock. They look like roots. Btw, next poster C&C jjfreight's sigs.
Eh... Commonly used Edward pic and not very originally used either. Giving it a monotone color and feathering it a bit doesn't make it your own. The color is nice but I just can't appreciate anything about it other then that. 2/10