put it this way if the yanks turned this into a nuclear war then australia is screwed, i live in australia and i dont like nuclear winter or the fact that iran will prob need only 1 nuke to blow the frikin island out of the water
^ Yes I agree. But why don't the Americans understand that war is not the solution, well from my point of view it should be peaceful and America should understand the problems being faced by the local citizens of Iran. If someone attacks or offenses a country then only their are consequences to that offense. I go for a peace and my appeal will always remain PEACE! Take care, Regards and no offense to anyone! =)
i agree... http://www.lewrockwell.com/rozeff/rozeff66.html << An interesting read on american war crimes that seems logical as well Well hmm .. bush is one crazy mofo .. I have no idea wtf hes thinking but hes put lives in between BOTH iraq and iran which can be suicidal , well it is if both gang up on the soldiers in there Why doesnt bush go and fight - the dumbass just sends families etc there to commit suicide attacking them to war with iran now when the public dont want an escalation just shows you how blinded and how egotistic bush is Even though soliders are supposed to do that ie defend the country - but what did iran do to US that made them go to war..? the weapons? & nuclear power plant - Its rubbish - everyone has got nukes now even US so why have they got it? The reason im abiding to is that US is running out supplies and basically invading every dam Middle eastern country there - If all the middle eastern countries get together by God US will get blown to pieces Not supposed to be offensive - Its just something that can happen if Bush stays in office too long ... his mind is fkd DARKSTAR
One nuke would probably kill a city the size of Sydney, depending on whether or not they air-bursted the weapon, the weather, or even the size of it. It would take thousands to "blow the island out of the water."
I don't know about Bush. He went to verginia after that high school drama and said how terribly sorry he was for those +30 kills. And he sends 10 000's of soldiers in war... and daily there are soldiers who die.... I never really understood the guy
And did you know that he personally writes each and every family of those soldiers that are killed? I've read my cousin's. Obviously, a letter is no real consolation, but to say that he doesn't give a ---- is untrue.
honestly have to agree with ferret here... he is the only person here who is logically deducing on his own rather than listening to what other 'unintelligent' sources have to say and repeating it... but you can't lie ferret. bush IS a little weird... in my philosophy class we have a poster of 'bushisms' ... it's pretty jkz i think hah
and yet, he can't count on my simpathy ... i just don't like him SO many activists and politicians asking to stop his war, adn let his troops come back... and what does he do.... sends a 30 000 more ... I don't get it
And if the commanders on the ground, those people that he's entrusting the war to (and by the way listening to), say they need that extra 30,000 to get the job done, he'll do it. If they ask for him to call up the reserves and dump those in, he'll do it. He's concerned with getting the job done, not what certain people think. Sitting back here in America and wondering why he would send troops over even when a lot of people don't want him to is not the way to go about it. Neither is sitting there on Capitol Hill and trying to tell the President how to do his job, though the majority of those up there haven't the slightest clue as to what's needed in Iraq, only what's needed to keep their House/Senate seat in the next election. I'm for sending more troops over if they're needed--I'd rather get it done now instead of going back ten years down the line because the public didn't have the stomach to see the job (that they almost overwhelmingly supported at the beginning...) through.
