I know more advanced Photoshop users have made their own method of mixing and such, but I've decided to make mine public if people would taken an interest in learning my mixing methods. Here's the turnout using one of my own renders: What this mixing is meant to do is to accentuate dark colors, while allowing brights to still take a large part in the render itself. It backs off a lot of mid-colors and glows outward. My method is very useful with nearly any background. If anyone's interested, I'll right up a quick tutorial. Just let me know guys.
Well, most people use stocks and manipulate them in the way that they want their final design to look like, but if you have a tut, post it.
It's pretty smart to ask..why waste 2-3 hrs writing a tutorial if no one is going to use it? Pointless imo. Anyways, I like that effect, so yeah, write a tutorial on how to do it.
lolz there are dozens. pointess to write it imo. no disrespect but it doesnt look that much different from a few extra duplications with blurs on different blending options, everyone can do tht right. i dont think your writing a tutorial of 2-3 hours on that btw
I hope you're joking. There are a lot of people who just started using Photoshop that don't know how to mix. And if you think that mixing can be seen on a grey background, YOU need the tutorial.
alright, then make me. EDIT: and bt. i did this in about 1 minute, with the usual blur and blending options. is it that much different? yours on the left, mine on the right http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/2382/bo...yma2copyzy3.jpg
BTW I have presets so mine takes about 2 seconds. Secondly it's mixing, and by using a grey background again you've proved that you're just that dumb. Thirdly, I was going to help the community by righting a tutorial and everyone got offensive, so I'm pretty sure you guys need to re-measure your e-penises because they're coming up short.
i'm not being offensive. like i said on my post. no disrespect. if your so content on it, just make it like i said already. then rid me of my "unknowing" that im "dumb" i didnt call you any names did i.
Sorry I can't prove that I'm better then somebody that is --- at a search engine [sotw.com is a search engine you --- searcha!]. Oh and I'm sorry for your clients aswell.
You're not proffessional... www.aeiko.com = proffessional designer. You're just some fag who's crappy editing skills and monstrosity of a signature make 99% of the internet retch in disgust. You may well have gotten payed to do some work (which I suspect is a signature or banner for some freeinvision 'gfx' forum), but I doubt it was for your artistic talent; it was more likely guilt money - you were payed because [whoever] felt sorry for you. [excuse the bad spelling of "proffessional", for some reason this stupid forum doesn't allow the correct one.]
Oh.. How come you are a ---? You might have won a sotw and some random GFX forum which are all around the internets and its not a big deal. That sig you have there was considered ------ when i was still doing graphics like over a year now and i dont think its even considered ------ now.Stop prtending you are --- becouse obsiviously you are not. Dont flame my buds becouse they are just being honest and saying the truth and sometimes the truth hurts. Just drop that EGO. It will cause you big problems you can imagine how many argumenets you will get in what that kind of ego. The image is an easy thing to do with basic adjustments .. Now stop bragging and get to practising and be a real ---.. Good day boy.
