Adobe Photoshop Vs Macromedia Fireworks

Discussion in 'GR Classic Archive' started by Wonderboy, Oct 9, 2006.

  1. Quyxz

    Quyxz Senior Member

    Age:
    36
    Posts:
    1,579
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    I used Fireworks before I used PS, it's easier, but you can do way less with it, than with ps.
     
  2. asx

    asx Member

    Age:
    36
    Posts:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2006
    Location:
    Borderlinin' Germany and Holland
    Depends on what you're used to.

    A skilled fireworks'er can do the same as a skilled photoshopper
     
  3. SpartanOps21

    SpartanOps21 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    977
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 2, 2006
    photoshop is a lil more versatile. i never used fireworks, but macromedia products are a little more simple then the photoshop series
     
  4. magestic4cyt

    magestic4cyt Member

    Posts:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    It's kind of like comparing apples and oranges. They are different programs designed for different purposes. Always use the best tool for the job at hand. The only way to find out which program is best for a given job, is to try them both out and see what works for you.
     
  5. xerolide

    xerolide Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    51
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2006
    To put it simple: Photoshop > Fireworks. I have both programs at the moment, never touched Fireworks because it seems so basic and novelty compared to the industry standard Photoshop. :P
     

Share This Page