I love NOD32 and Kapersky but I can't choose between them. I've used Kapersky before and now I'm trying the free trial for Nod32. Both of them are good but I don't know which should I subscribe. Any opinions?
Nod32, Once upon a time I used Kapersky, and it was too hot. Then I found Norton, and it was too cold. Then I found Nod32, and it was just right... ok.. Nod32, Avast, or AVG are at the top of my list, used all three simiutaneusly, and still worked like the three bears...
Eh, I don't like Nod32 much, whenever I scanned I don't even think it was scanning because it kept saying file locked and at the end of the "scan" there was no viruses, so I dunno..I'm using Kaspersky right now
Agreed with everyone above. Nod32 like tazzy said, is not a resource hog. It is low KB, and has updates every hour.
Lol, loads of this "nod32" fans out here. I personally use Kasperskys whole set. It is the only one that I have found working like it should. It warns you from a suspicious actions, it disables the internet usage of the programs you really dont want to be using it ( EXAMPLE, some virus that is port scanning some ports of some companys comp. ). You can choose to have an automated updatemode, it checks for updates and updates as soon as some are available. And it doesnt block any unnessecery progs *COUGHPRONSTREAMCOUGH* like winamp and such... yea... So, I trust Kaspersky as it doesnt let anything in that I dont want. Like a condom, safe but so sweet....
Hmm, both are good. Tough choice. Since I've used both, I'd say Kaspersky. It uses less resources imo, doesn't lag the system and is easy to use. NOD32 would be my second choice, though.
