Ok so I was visiting this certain board and rated a work of one member I posted that his work needed improvement and gave him some pointers.He started bashing my sig and told me to stfu and I wasn't allowed to to hate his work cuz mine sucked.So i'm asking in a neutral board which of us is better?I know mine is far from pro and is novice but imo i'm still allowed to give comments to sigs.
I don't like topics titled 'Look' or 'Click' or 'z0mg'... One of my pet peeves... But the top one is definately better. Is that yours?
No offense, but why does this matter? Sigs show very little skill or talent, they are meant to be aesthetic, not articulate, and therefore showing they are meant to be based on others opinions, which yours clearly wins in most cases, however its highly opinionated. I admit, that I, myself, do hold high respect for a fair amount of old school grunge and abstract artists, even in this massive trend of female stocks, C4D, smudging and LP C4D renders. Why does it matter who is better on the average than the other? It is all opinions, and simply by asking you arent not intending signatures to be held articulately, as art should be, and you are still taking offense to it from someone over the internet? You should be pleased that your work is how a loto f people like it, maybe he feels that his signatures are more articulate, rather than aesthetic, being that they mean something to him, and artent intended for other artists to judge. Just a thought. I voted for yours however, as it is moreso pleasing to the eye than the other one.
