some people think that. They are just harder to make a good sig with. Its harder to incorperate real stocks rather than gaming. Harder to blend, properly color, lighting becomes more difficult. I dont care whats in my sig, long as the stock is good. Im not gonna search like tom cruise or somethin, cuz hes a celeb. I could use a stock of some random for all i care
and makes it seem like there pic is better.. people should seriously use less splatter brush, and c4d's. Greasy Pete's discussion doesnt count also... anyone in UV, AM, AG dont count becuase they're just different...
i for one still like these kinds of sigs....no matter how out-trended they are i saw one of them in someones current i really like...if i can find it ill pots it :shaggy:
i don't really use stocks of people, but the farthest i'll go is a cgi screenshot of a game :J kh2 cgi's ftw
I've never tried using a real person in one of my signatures because it looks a lot more difficult. It just looks like finding a good way to blend and color them would be a lot more difficult than blending and coloring a Gaming Render. And I like using C4D because it is easier, even if I'm not that great at using it >.>
I like the celeb sigs but i aint got creds to buy one yet, i want one with Hilary Duff :wub: Shes hot. :wub:
hell i think they are cool to but were you around when gamerenders was all grunge? it was quite hysterical
