Rate The Sig Above You ..

Discussion in 'Graphics discussion' started by TheGrudge214, Jan 5, 2002.

  1. UV Eccentric

    UV Eccentric Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    2,676
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2005
    4.5/10 bad lighting, no negative space and the almost b&w doesn't look good here
     
  2. McFarlane

    McFarlane Well-Known Member

    Age:
    34
    Posts:
    1,612
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2004
    Location:
    Westbury, New York
    9
    9
    8.5

    Well done
     
  3. Cloacal.Kiss

    Cloacal.Kiss Well-Known Member

    Age:
    36
    Posts:
    377
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2006
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    hawt. love the first one.

    9.

    not a fan of the nearly b&w look. although you pull it off quite well.

    8 for both bottom ones.

    edit: mine was for eccentric. McFarlane got to it before me. :[
     
  4. stokey

    stokey Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,621
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 29, 2005
    7.5/10
    7/10

    not really my type of style..but still nice.
     
  5. Cloacal.Kiss

    Cloacal.Kiss Well-Known Member

    Age:
    36
    Posts:
    377
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2006
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    #1- 8/10. awesome. I love it. the "Stokey" text could use work though.
    #2 - 7/10 too bright imo.
    #3 - lol. pretty cool but 6/10. way too much contrast.
     
  6. UV Eccentric

    UV Eccentric Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    2,676
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2005
    5/10 both nad contrast, bad lighting, and look like really low quality
     
  7. jozaE

    jozaE Well-Known Member

    Age:
    36
    Posts:
    2,399
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    9 on all great job especially the jessica biel one, nice job even when only using one color
     
  8. stokey

    stokey Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,621
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 29, 2005
    8.5/10 for all, really cool sigs
     
  9. McFarlane

    McFarlane Well-Known Member

    Age:
    34
    Posts:
    1,612
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2004
    Location:
    Westbury, New York
    5 For the top two :(

    7 For the last one.
     
  10. Pharell

    Pharell Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,724
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2004
    6
    7.5
     
  11. McFarlane

    McFarlane Well-Known Member

    Age:
    34
    Posts:
    1,612
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2004
    Location:
    Westbury, New York
    Pharell don't be lame :(

    6 Overall like I said before.
     
  12. Pharell

    Pharell Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,724
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2004
    Am i being lame? just rated on what i see.

    6 - just too plain, dont see much in it.

    7.5 - nice effects, text isnt appealing.
     
  13. Greasy Pete

    Greasy Pete Senior Member

    Age:
    34
    Posts:
    9,314
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 15, 2005
    Location:
    Massachusetts
    7/10 nice

    6/10 too sharpened

    7/10 ok color

    ----------------

    ya Pharell, dont be lame, Mcfarlen's bottom current is godly
     
  14. InfernoSnow

    InfernoSnow Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,570
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Oooh, both 9's. I love the detail, especially in the second one.
     
  15. Unmasked-Haku

    Unmasked-Haku Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    49
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2006
    the first one i give it a 7.5/10 the right side is dead and i also, dont like your text.

    but, for the second one 9.5/10 i love it great aount of depth, great details, and and blending is nice
     

Share This Page