Some Sig

Discussion in 'GR Classic Archive' started by Fac3full, Jan 22, 2005.

  1. Fac3full

    Fac3full Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    47
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2005
    [​IMG]
    and
    [​IMG]
     
  2. Celduin

    Celduin Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    183
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2005
    they are too plain, texts are hard to see and the render should stan out more in the 2 second one, there are just advices so dont take offence ;)
     
  3. Tha_Punisher

    Tha_Punisher Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    167
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    first doesnt have a great background and is a bit boring, second one is better

    first : 6/10
    second: 7,5/10
     
  4. .Illum.

    .Illum. Well-Known Member

    Age:
    36
    Posts:
    702
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2005
    First 1 is good - 7/10

    and can't see the second one (crappy IE :lol:)
     
  5. Nyc Elite

    Nyc Elite Well-Known Member

    Age:
    38
    Posts:
    825
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2004
    Location:
    ...
    Too plain. Incomprehensible text. 6/10.
     
  6. buscemi

    buscemi Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    2,399
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2005
    Location:
    aruba
    text ain't good..first bg ain't bad...
     
  7. Bona Fide

    Bona Fide Well-Known Member

    Age:
    37
    Posts:
    4,067
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2004
    Location:
    New York, USA
    Get Firefox. ;)

    1st one : 6.5/10
    2nd one : 7/10

    Everyone else hit on the major points already. :)
     
  8. daZ!

    daZ! Member

    Posts:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    good sig m8...erm backgrounds seem alil plain...n i wud work on ya txt too
     

Share This Page