Dunno if I'm really qualified to comment on my favorite president.. buy anyhoo.. my favorite is Jimmy Carter. He's cool <3
Clinton's lie didn't cause Americans to die, Bush lied about the WMD's, Bush lies alot. The soldiers did sign up for the military to fight, I'll give you that. But what were they fighting for? Oh yeah to stop the dictator of Iraq from using the WMD's right? And don't give me that bull ---- "We liberated an entire country", because we're only expanding our empire instead of worrying about what goes on in our own country.
no conservitives want to progress slowly, not to not change things at all. democrats want rapid change. people who want things to stay the way they are are called somethin different but I had a bad civics teacher so I don't remember. I couldn't really say that washing was conservative or not, I never really learned anything about him, so I can't really argue with you about that.
Every president brought something to the presidency, and honestly..without every single one of them in order, things would have turned out differently - in a postive, or negative way. My favorites would have to be George Washington, Jefferson, Jackson, Lincoln, Cleveland, FDR, and George Bush, Jr.
Like I said in an early post, fighting this war is helping our own country, just not in the ways that you may agree with. Bush didn't lie about WMD, he had enough evidence (obviously) to invade Iraq. I will quote Dave Chappelle now. "THE NIGGA HAS ALUMINUM TUBES! CAN SOME TELL ME WHAT THE ---- YOU CAN DO WITH AN ALUMINUM TUBE? ALUMINUM!!"
Ha helping us? Sure. Because of all this fuss about Iraq, our gas prices are soaring, 40% of Americans don't have insurance, the gap between the rich and the poor is ridiculous, unemployment is disgusting, our education is failing. The war...hmm...um...yeah, not to sure of the positives. And please don't tell me "Well a dictator is out of power now!", well yeah but Bush is worse for killing his people indirectly. Bush has become the biggest terrorist.
okay well the poor people should have voted. they had the power to elect someone different and they didn't, and thats there fault.
Wow that's pretty low, blaming the poor people, the people who have to work hours and hours and hours just to keep surviving. And it doesn't matter if they voted or not apparently since more people voted for Gore the first time and then a little under half voted for Kerry the second time.
We all have to face it, Bush sucks as a president basically as hes more concerned with completing his daddy's work and impressing the conservatives who want us to interfere with other nations, but Kerry would have done worse. I am a democrat on most circumstances, even though its still about a 50/50 split (more like 65/35). Kerry couldnt even keep his speeches in line. He contradicted himself more times than I bothered to count. Bush just cant pronouse "nuclear" right lol We had two horrible candidates in the last 2 elections (Gore included, though he would have been better than Bush and technically should have been in office). Besides that, I think revolver and I agree on most things.
You are saying it is low for me to blame the poor people for not voting if they think that it will raise their standard quality of living? How is that low? It is their fault that they didn't care enough about their lives to try to change it.
