there are plenty reasons why people wouldnt know, i cant explain them in public right now since it would indefinatley spoil the movie, but if you want to know exactly how it would appear to someone watching saw 2 for the first time without saw 1 then i can explain that to you and how i didnt spoil anything. anyone who saw saw 1 before seeing saw 2 recognized that girl to begin with, so they knew something was going on. if you notice there was a needle on the floor in the origional room that is empty that looked extremely like an antidote. not to mention it wasnt john/the girls desire to kill the boy, it was to get his father.
Lmao i guess its just after you know who the killer is the first time its kinda like you know whats going to happen.
saw 1 are way much better made than saw 2 IMO... not said that saw 2 are a bad movie... but i like the first better
It wasn't that gruesome... Ive seen way worst things, but the idea behind the movie is quite original. It was a good sequel for a great movie.
i loved saw and really went in with high expectations of saw 2, i wsnt disspointed! i really liked saw 2...and it left it open for a great prequel.
Okay questions... The girl with the boy at the end. Did she put the boy in the safe? How could she do that if they were in another house? so there should be a saw 3 right?
she got out of the house with the kid (all the people were dead and there was the numers on their necks, etc.) and went to the house that most of the movie is filmed in with the dad and jigsaw and then they placed him in a safe with an oxygen tank in there. i forgot the exact thing (i should probably rewatch it?), but it was either the key was in the safe, or a couple antidotes were in the safe and the door was on a timer, i forgot which. and yes, they left it open for a saw 3, but with a different person as the main "bad guy"
