First one is verry nice! Neat effects and ill give it a 8.5 Although the second one is VERY plain... a 3 out of 10
6/10 bg is nice but it's blurry. scanlines don't look good on it. And that Urban-like text doesn't seem to go well with the bg.
7/10 combined...I dont think the first one flows too well, and the second is just a tad too plain IMO.
5.5/10. no flow, no direction. just a centred stock/cutout. nice bg work tho, but looks a lot like random brushing.
8/10 Love the top sig... good use of direction to attract attention to the sig in the center second lets you down, it just doesnt flow as well as the top... great work though (Rate latest please)
6/10 for both this is probably just me but they look like you just added a c4d and a lens flare for the bg...but you added the glow to it so it saved the sig
i could go through all the trouble of making a nice fancy little sig... add all the nice little bg with gradient, smudge, lens flare, then screw around with blending modes, but then it doesn't mean anything, doesn't flow, and is really pointless. 6.5/10 overall. work on the text. top one's left side looks really busy.