Rate The Sig Above You ..

Discussion in 'Graphics discussion' started by TheGrudge214, Jan 5, 2002.

  1. [.BC.] SuperSupra

    [.BC.] SuperSupra Well-Known Member

    Age:
    30
    Posts:
    681
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Location:
    New York *hint* *hint*
    5/10
    dont like the tilted render or effect
     
  2. Deus

    Deus Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    540
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2004
    it's okay... 6/10 too bland... not enough depth
     
  3. Sengirvampire

    Sengirvampire Well-Known Member

    Age:
    36
    Posts:
    396
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2006
    First:8/10 needs work on the text on the top nice bg and render tho

    Second: needs work on the lighting very nice text tho 8/10
     
  4. .HaVoC.

    .HaVoC. ┌∩┐(-_-)┌∩┐

    Age:
    34
    Posts:
    6,245
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2005
    Location:
    New Orleans
    7/10
     
  5. Joey Crack

    Joey Crack Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    100
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    sick
     
  6. .sentinel

    .sentinel Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    893
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2005
    Dosne't have a sig and please follow the right way to critique.
     
  7. Ecks

    Ecks Well-Known Member

    Age:
    33
    Posts:
    624
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2005
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    6/10.

    you should try to fill out the sig more. if u used c4d or something, add some saturation to it to bring out more colour. try making the stock actually look like it comes from the sig, and not just pasted there.
     
  8. .HaVoC.

    .HaVoC. ┌∩┐(-_-)┌∩┐

    Age:
    34
    Posts:
    6,245
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2005
    Location:
    New Orleans
    5/10

    looks too crowed
     
  9. Binnsy

    Binnsy Well-Known Member

    Age:
    35
    Posts:
    83
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2005
    Location:
    Nottingham, England
    first 7/10 <--- i love the background but im not to keen on that style of render, might just be a matter of taste though

    second 8.5/10 <---- loving the blending techniques but i feel it gets maybe a tiny bit bland towards the edges.

    There both awseome though :)
     
  10. David.Blanch

    David.Blanch Well-Known Member

    Age:
    33
    Posts:
    2,451
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2005
    Location:
    Denmark
    kinda plain and the render doesn't blend..

    5/10
     
  11. Countpuchi

    Countpuchi Member

    Posts:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2006
    6/10 - I like the shadowy effect, Nice and the sig is bit too dark (the bg)

    [​IMG]
     
  12. Lisa.

    Lisa. Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,816
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2005
    5..
    It looks weird!
     
  13. ludjer

    ludjer Well-Known Member

    Age:
    33
    Posts:
    860
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 4, 2005
    Location:
    South Africa
    6/10 it does not look bad
    i don't know why??
     
  14. Ecks

    Ecks Well-Known Member

    Age:
    33
    Posts:
    624
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2005
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    5.5/10. fill it up more. work on text.
     
  15. eli1277

    eli1277 Well-Known Member

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    122
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2005
    very odd, but there is something about it i like 7.5/10
     

Share This Page