Well, I cant say I like either one of them However, Toxicf gmv. First off, in darkz sig, you cannot see the render. I know you were going for the dragon in the fire look, but it didn't work. Next, the thing is too bright, it looks terrible. Lastly, I can't tell if its Beveled, or if its just some border around the outside of the sig, but it doesn't look good. Toxic, first off, take that big black blob off the right side of the sig, and fill it in with something. Next, the text looks horrible, you need some new fonts.
toxic gmv very scenic . nice sig darkz = really whoring that style, + its far too bright, taking away precious detail (that SHOULD be there <<)
toxic gmv i like the feel to it over the fire of the other Merged Post: toxic gmv i like the feel to it over the fire of the other
Toxic GMV. On darks, the render doesnt look good it doenst fit in. I think its too small, and probaly that the bg wouldnt suit most sprites, it just doesnt look right. Also, the flames dont look too much like flames, their too white. I like toxics because you can see it has a lot of depth, and the industrial effect is something I havent seen before, its pretty original.
ok im voting for toxic, he got me with the hl2, im sorry i cant vote against that. but...there is a big splot by the sunspot. i dont like that. and whatever the other guy's name is, is that a friekin pokemon? too many empty spots too
