I've done a few movie reviews in my time. I only bother if the movie is actually worth watching, if not then I will not waste a character defying its stupidity. Movie: King Kong Director: Peter Jackson Release Date: December 14, 2005 Length: 3 Hours Main Cast: Jack Black, Naomi Watts, Adrien Brody Review: King Kong is yet another extraordinary work of wonder directed by Peter Jackson. The plot revolves around a young woman by the name of Ann Darrow, played by Naomi Watts, who partakes in a daring expedition to shoot a movie on the mythical "Skull Island." Though on the first day of shooting the crew discovers that the island is inhabited by not only man, but creature as well. Their adventure leads them through both near death, and also deadly confrontations, in which a few crew members are killed. Kong eventually takes Ann and in a sense kidnaps her. At this point the creature falls in love with Ann and wont let anything seperate the two. Many times he risks his life fighting Dinosaurs and man. This movie is a tragic love story from beginning to end. The special effects only add to the appeal and make King Kong a must see movie. I give King Kong a rating of 5 STARS
first off, movies can only get 4 stars last time i checked, and yes, it was a very excellent movie. the only part i didnt liek was hat it took an hour to actually get to the island. my favoirtie scene was the trex fight, ofcourse, do i give it 3.5stars outta 4
Um I didn't write "King Gong" not one time... So I dunno where you read that. And I rate my movies on 5 starts. I don't care what others do. But thanks for the comments.
You're the one that said movies can only get 4 starts, as if it's against the law or something. So I said the "others" refering to the people you were refering to. You brought it up so I figured you'd know what you were talking about.
