VERY CHOPPY. 3/10 Let Me Give u A Hint Instead of making it Invisible ( trans ) Make the background the Color of the FOrum then it would not look pixelated at edges If it wasnt like that then id give u 8\10
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHA Amazing work dude.. I guess u used the clone stamp tool?? anyways AWESOME! I fucking love it.
I'm kind of getting tired of this rivalry; why can't we all just get along? Halo 2 and HL2 are both great games in their own minds, but none of them have to smash eachother. And it doesn't help that the render isn't very good, either. It is SO very choppy. Ugh... 1/10
Just because the render is choppy...you give it a 3/10 or a 1/10. Big F'n deal. Here we go..shadow...you sig colors dont match and your text sucks and so do those scan lines. theres a reason for a 3-5/10 and CWD I dont think your multi-coloring doesnt look good and learn to blend text..so i guess I will give it a 1/10... but just because the render is choppy doesnt mean its a bad sig. Anwyas...on to the sig...I give it a 7/10. The colors are a bit bright and the border needs some work. keep at it.
No, you don't understand at all. How about learning some things before posting. There are two factors that a good reviewer must look at: How it looks. This one is ok, except for the render. I would give this section a 6 or 7/10. How much effort is put into it: Not much in this part. Filters finished up the shiny stuff, but the render shows signs of 5 minute work. That is what lowers the score considerably. And by the way, this thread is to rate the sig shown, not other peoples. Idiot... I also use Photoshop Elements 2.0. No simple man can shoot out a sig with half the tools Photoshop 7 or CS has. So think before you talk, son.
Son...lmao...please little boy I wouldnt want to spank you. I know that its still rate the thread starters sig...but I couldnt help but pick out the little details about your sig that suck. I dont care if you have half of the elements ps 7 does... And I have learned plenty. I have been here longer than you...so I suggest you shut up when you talk to me about learning things about posting in forums and making sigs. And if those are the 2 factors one must look at whilst rating a sig...why didnt you mention it in your above post where you rated his sig. All you said was that you were tired of the riveraly crap and that the render was choppy. Then you continued to rate the sig with a 1/10. So in the post where you rated it...you should have said... Looks: <rating> Effort(opinion): <rating> rather than prattling on about the riveraly stuff. There...spanked...I suggest you shut your mouth next time kid.
Get some anger management help. Seriously, if you had two brain cells you would know that you rate others sigs. wtf? Bashing on my sig when I haven't even talked to you? You are showing to everyone in the world that you are not smart enough to follow the rules. Uh, that means that I have to do a LOT more things that you do to make my sig half decent. So you get it off easy. Uh, what is this "rivelry"? If you talking about my comment on Halo 2 and HL2, take the time to write it out. And if you "learned plenty", then learn how to spell. That shouldn't be so hard, hm? Who rates a sig with 2 factors? I weigh them in. From a photoshop users point of view, the effort factor weighs in more than the looks. "riveraly". See above about spelling, and I was not prattling on, I was commentin. "Kid"? I'm 23.
Lmao your 23 and you are fighting with a 14 year old. Imature if you ask me. And you even said yourself...2 factors. I dont care if my spelling sucks...its because I type fast. You even mention 2 factors. Sorry to make you look even more stupid than you seem to be. And neptune is right...you are a noob. Also...if your 23...why is your name gogglyboy? Wouldnt it be gogglyman. Or maybe gogglyimaturefor23
I'm glad my suck-ass sig has made so much controversy. I fixed it up a little bit. (Keep in mind, I have been making sigs for less than a month, so they're not going to be por-grade just yet). EDIT: (and changed the colors)
