Well, have to congradulate you on only having one image in your sig... unlike other people. -_- Well onward to the sig. First are the thing I like about it. First, I love that you have no text. There are not many people here that seem to have the guts to do that. Second, you are one of the few people I have ever seen that have made real people actually seem welcome on a signature and that is a pretty good acheivement. Things I don't like: First, there is no border... it really needs one. Even a simple black one would be nice. Second, the sig almost seems over crowded with too much stuff, like you tried too hard. Third, I don't like the line going right down her face and bluring it out on one side. It makes a good effect but I don't think it is fitting for this image. Fourth, I just don't like pink. I'm not going to mark you off at all for that but I just really don't like pink. And fifth and finally, I don't like the monotone color of the image. Seems a bit too flat. It looks like you tried to add texture to it by adding shapes but the best thing to do is add color to it. The whole backround is difference shades of the same color. It does help the image stick out more but the backround needs more umph so to speak. 6.5/10 Edit: Mine was too Leethal but Truechaldean seemed to beat me, I'll leave this here anyway. I guess I'll do Truechaldean also: First sig: I like the composition of it. The way it is put together, it is nice but the colors seem too... bland I guess. And the swooshy look is getting a bit overused. Maybe go for something a bit... more colorful and bright. The text is too plain too. 6.5/10 Second Sig: Worse then the first all togeather. Not too bud but still worse. I don't like how you only show her bottom half. It's creative but not effective. When people look at a person they always look at the eyes and if you cut those off then the viewer feels unsatisfied Also, it is very blurry and pixelated. Needs to be sharped a bit. And last, I like how you didn't use any text. I've always thought text breaks up signatures. 4/10
I do believe Leethal only had one. Anyway, this is not the place to talk like this. Continue with the critiquing.
woow...Leminnes, you and critiquing are made for each other kdding. Yours is simple yet effective, like the white line all across the sig. Although the colors are not the best. But it's fine to me 6.5/10 nvm the text when rating mine, it sux I know, so don't rate it. Tomorrow I'll take it off...
top one is awomse i like ti everytime i see it. i say 9/10 bottom one i dont like as much, but it is no brushing.. i like how you kept the render..i say 7/10
eternalapoc: for the first one, Paul Pierce doesn't like leaves behind him . The bg is plain, but the light dots are cool. The addons were dispensable. 5/10 second, the render is nice, the bg is nice, text sux (both texts). but everything else, if there is anything else, is cool. 7/10 third, like the bg, looks like you've worked on it, the render is cool, i liked how you did that to his hand (the smudging). the addons were cooler if were not that visible. But there's one thing I don't understand: you blend your nickname (Epoc), but don't blend the name Bison? =/ 7/10
7/10 top one, i cant really make out the pic and it just doesnt appeal to me much 9/10 on the second, i love how it looks like rain
Im not gonna rate the first cause its not really a sig, but... 1st-the text needs work, and i dont like those side brs, not my style. 5/10 2nd- u brushed grungy and used tech so thats not that nice. the text is creative, but the colors arent very good. another 5/10
Sig One: Well, it's interesting. Not something I've seen before. I actually kinda like it. The thing is that it doesn't have much detail. I can tell it was worked on for a good period of time but it also seems like it was just thrown togeather by random things. And, the text is very plain and not very exiting, it seems a little pixelated. Actually the whole sig just seems a bit pixelated but I applaud you on using your creative side. 5/10 Sig Two: Everything I said about sig one pertains here too. The only addition is that this one seems very 2D. It needs a bit more depth. It's too light, just add more contrast to it and it should be much better. Also, the white text is almost imposible to read. 4/10
