Rate The Sig Above You ..

Discussion in 'Graphics discussion' started by TheGrudge214, Jan 5, 2002.

  1. hellkat

    hellkat Well-Known Member

    Age:
    34
    Posts:
    814
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Location:
    Long Island, New York
    Yoshii

    I'm not a fan of the text or background of either, but they flow nicely :D

    8 for both.
     
  2. Leethal

    Leethal Well-Known Member

    Age:
    34
    Posts:
    2,869
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2005
    Location:
    SunnyDale
    HellKaT

    6/10 The red text kills the flow, and it seems kind of monotone.
     
  3. MFKR

    MFKR Well-Known Member

    Age:
    34
    Posts:
    905
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2005
    Location:
    Canada
    6/10 would of given it a 8.5 if it wasent a tut outcome
     
  4. mushir

    mushir Well-Known Member

    Age:
    29
    Posts:
    566
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2005
    Location:
    Norway
    7/10. not my style so i cant say much.
     
  5. Kiazox

    Kiazox Well-Known Member

    Age:
    32
    Posts:
    252
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2005
    Location:
    West Sussex - England
    sigs got nice style :D 7.8/10
     
  6. Leminnes

    Leminnes Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    47
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2006
    I'll go from top to bottom and left to right.

    Sig one: Fire is far over used. I don't care if it shows power, which in your case it doesn't. I really don't like how ther image feels in general and feels way too generic. I just get that5 feeling that I have seen it before. I also really don't like the text, just seems to be missing something. For the positives, the image is pretty good and well done although the blue clashes badly with the red. I also like the size. I usually like a bit smaller but it is pretty good size in relitivity to the image. Out of 10 I'm going to have to give it a 2.5.

    Sig Two: That image I have seen. I've never peticularly liked it or ever wanted to see it again. This sig is just bad seeing as how it is just a crop of a stock image. The text is horrible. .5/10

    Sig Three: Just a bad montage with a glow it seems. Just not appealling. Text bad again. 1/10

    Sig Four: So far this is your best. A better use of colors in this one and the "hippy" feel is kinda nice. I nust feel that the stock image does not fit the backround. And thw way it is blended in is very bad, the fading does not look good. The faded text is also pretty bad. 3/10

    Sif Five: I don't know if you meant to do the last four sigs in progessively better order, but you did. This one is definately the best of the bunch. the colors in the back are nicely done and this is the only one where I like the text. The stock image doesn't quite fit the backround but it is pretty good. 3.5/10

    Overall: Your set needs some work. You need to, one, put some emotions into your pieces of art (seeing as that is what a sig is, a tiny piece of artwork). Show some anger, love, happiness or something in your sigs. Two, you need to try and make a signature without a stock image. Make it something of your own that reflects something in your life. It doesn't matter if your first one looks like crap. just keep trying. Remember, artwork is not defined by the techniques or tools you use but by what you put into them, hard work and a small part of yourself. Live by these rules and I believe you could start making amazing signatures.

    Edit: Also, I have found that the million images in your sig does not look good at all. Either narrow it down to one or find some other way to put them togeather that it doesn't look so bad.
     
  7. c6x Essn

    c6x Essn Well-Known Member

    Age:
    32
    Posts:
    1,344
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Location:
    FL
    holy crap, what a damn good review,

    not sure what it is, but it looks cool though
    8/10
     
  8. -NEO-

    -NEO- Active Member

    Age:
    34
    Posts:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    your newest looks ok, it doesn't really flow for me, so i give it a 7/10

    your current looks verry cool and original!! only the text could improve..
    8/10
     
  9. CloudSSJ

    CloudSSJ Well-Known Member

    Age:
    37
    Posts:
    2,486
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2005
    Location:
    Poland
    Beaverelfeater:

    really nice ones with original style - 9/10 for both
     
  10. Leethal

    Leethal Well-Known Member

    Age:
    34
    Posts:
    2,869
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2005
    Location:
    SunnyDale
    CloudSSJ

    Left:
    6/10 Nice colors, interesting techniques, but the text in the bottom right kills the while thing.

    Right:
    6.5/10 Interesting border idea, I like it. The style is a little overused, and the text could be better though.
     
  11. markers

    markers Well-Known Member

    Age:
    36
    Posts:
    492
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2005
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    [​IMG]

    8.5/10
     
  12. <T>Chaos

    <T>Chaos Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,198
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2005
    7/10 wh0red
     
  13. markers

    markers Well-Known Member

    Age:
    36
    Posts:
    492
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2005
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    whats whored?

    [​IMG]

    8/10
     
  14. SM hallow

    SM hallow Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    2,201
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    8/10
    i dont like the pink box on the left

    [​IMG]
     
  15. ..w00t..

    ..w00t.. Well-Known Member

    Age:
    32
    Posts:
    1,464
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2005
    Location:
    Canada, Ontario
    hallow

    Nice sig but the text looks choppy and it looks empty --7.8/10--

    w00t
     

Share This Page