World War 3

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Iron Bonney, Jan 29, 2006.

  1. Λtreyu

    Λtreyu Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,505
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    That doesn't mean jack ----. Germany had a much larger army than we did. So did japan, and yet we won over japan almost singlehandedly, and defeated germany with britain and russia.

    Just because china has more infantry doesn't mean their military is superior to ours (it isn't).
     
  2. .sentinel

    .sentinel Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    893
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2005
    That article is BULL----. It is ----ing bull----. Also world war 3 is going to be nuclear and the entire earth will be a big nuclear wasteland.
     
  3. Garrett

    Garrett Well-Known Member

    Age:
    35
    Posts:
    1,061
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2004
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    "Wars are won with slaughter and maneuver. The greater the general, the more he demands in maneuver, and less in slaughter"

    thats a more or less reproduction of the quote. anyways back to your point i guess the leaders then knew tactics, maneuver, the works.

    nowadays, everyone who isnt it the everyday working class get lazy and even those who are in it. Soooo the generals who live life so well, do nothing, get lazy, order everyone to rush in and shoot. wwII was a much more tactical opperation, stuff like that. Now they wouldnt bother, and would just cut to the chase.

    It doesnt matter if your a super ub3r 1337 army though, when your faced with big enough numbers it eventualy becomes to much to handle.... territory per men, defenses, it becomes all unbalanced, and they get the advantage because they can cover more aspects, and still have men to space... so i think your wrong on that spot.
     
  4. JaeTM

    JaeTM Senior Member

    Age:
    35
    Posts:
    2,072
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2005
    Location:
    United States
    Yes but if you remember, the US didn't enter the war right away as all the other countries did. So we had fresh troops and we came and defeated them. Also the US actually caused the attacks on Pearl Harbor. We were sending our scraps and metals and all that and Japan used that to build up their weapons, they come back and bomb us with our own material.

    Now China isn't using all their money to build up their economy, their using it to build up their army. Now if the US doesn't do something soon China and all the places in the world that they are getting to be their allies, the countries that hate the US, they will just come up from South America and cut off our supply to resources. Germany tried to do this but we caught them before they could.
     
  5. Rave-

    Rave- Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    295
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    The only reason that Germany was defetead was because they attacked Russia. If Hitler hadn't made that dumb mistake, imagine our lives right now..

    Btw, there's a chance of a terrorist attack tomorow.
    All of Americas government will all be in one place :]
     
  6. Essence

    Essence Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,709
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2005
    this will be a war to end the world.........
    one country will launch a nuclear weapon and everyone follows and boom.....see ya in hell
     
  7. Iron Bonney

    Iron Bonney Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    623
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005

    I dont see that the article is bull---- or ----ing bull---- , Its not written by someone off his mind, It is just facts of history layed there.
     
  8. varanus

    varanus Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    62
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2006
    lucky for me im in aus they a little isolated country down south, we got no true enemies, exept f***ing hitler if he was alive i wuld chop his d*ck off and shove it in his mouth
     
  9. UV Double D

    UV Double D Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,501
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2005

    WOW!!!!!!!!! people are funny here, it was 60 years ago , nowadays French people and french government think about the situation before declaring a war !!! They may be considered as cowards but certainly not stupids!!

    This WW3 is a whimsical thing !! China doesnt think about war but all Chinese people work hardly to make the country more powerful !!!

    If there will be a new world war, it will be very quick !! Everybody throws his nuclear bomb and we count the victims!!
    It will be possible if Iran obtain the nuclear bomb!!!
     
  10. Asirdor

    Asirdor Senior Member

    Age:
    35
    Posts:
    130
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2005
    err they wont nuke... coz if china or whoever miss hit any part of the world UK will step in to dis-arm china of WOMD and UK pwnd all last time well... UK/US
     
  11. Spectre257

    Spectre257 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    150
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2005
    This is quite correct as china doesnt want to pick a fight with anyone for now, nuclear weapons are usually last resort weapons.
    If you look at WW2 the battle style was strategic war while if you look at the Vietnam war it was small encounters with the enemy, it was just guerrilla combat where the enemy is most of the time unseen, the fighting was brutal and there was no definate front line it was just like fighting the enemy as they came unlike in world war 2 when the troops could most of the time see there opponents and there was a definate and visible from line. This was the reason the American army lost against the Viet-Con army, most of the time the Americans were acctually fighting the irregular army or the malitia if you want to put it that way, they also say that the only troops the the Viet-Con feared were the South Vietnamese Army the Americans were pretty much "easy" pray because most of the US troops were marely kids conscripted into the army (no offence ment to any Vietnam veterans). You see the two styles of warfare are radically different, on one side you can see your opponent's positions and so-on and there is a front line that the enemy is holding, while the other you just walk into a village which is in the enemy's territory and there is no resistance a few hours later you get attacked then your enemies disappear, then re-appear on some other location or the people turn on your I read a real acount from a soldier a little girl walk towards him and his mates with two grenades he was forced to shoot her but his mates got wounded when the grenades exploded so you see in guerrilla warfare anyone and everyone can be a soldier men, women and children faught.
    Having the bigger army doesnt mean that you'll win out right because a smaller army can slowly bog larger armies down to size with ease, like in poker if you play your card right you'll win :P
    I hope I explained well enough ^_^
     
  12. RednaN

    RednaN Well-Known Member

    Age:
    40
    Posts:
    100
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2005
    Location:
    Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    WW3 won't take more than 2 or 3 weeks. With the current technologies, speeds...

    All the powers have A-bombs (which they prob wont use) so everyone will becareful.

    The war to take over Iraq in (??)2003(correct me if i'm wrong) took 1 week. The main resistance was broken.

    Why should anyone think the whole world will be involved in a war... with the current weapons (for example the Tomahawk-missile) nations or units can't miss a target anymore....
     
  13. Spectre257

    Spectre257 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    150
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2005
    Umm.. I heard that the CIA just bought off the Iraqi soldiers :huh:
     
  14. Iron Bonney

    Iron Bonney Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    623
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    Because the world's leaders are the most greedy people on earth.
     
  15. RednaN

    RednaN Well-Known Member

    Age:
    40
    Posts:
    100
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2005
    Location:
    Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    LOL... how come you think that? And please name the world leaders for me and why they should be greedy...
     

Share This Page