Rate The Sig Above You ..

CloudSSJ

5/10 for both
try to make alot more experiments and testing, you sigs are kinda basic

 

6/10

 

Sineplex

1- render is to small and text ruins it --5/10--
2- bg is good but the render isnt blended and i dont think it suits the sig, also text is gettin better --5.5/10--
3- good that u used lighting effects but the text ruins it --5.8/10--

w00t

 

both I give 7.5

 

text needs work

8/10

 

meerak

1- work on bg text and render blending --5/10--
2- same thing as first but a lil better --5.5/10--

--Lower the opacity of the scan lines (just a hint) ^_^--

w00t

 

Looks good, though I think the text could use some more depth. 8/10

 

Paran0ia

work on render blending and dont pu scan line sover the render it ruins it --6/10--

w00t

 

that's pretty pwnage...but text could use some work and it seems a tad bit bright but could be my screen...8/10

 

nice work DAC
i wouls say 6.5/10 for both

 

Yamraj

1- work on text but everything looks good --7/10--
2- User posted Image

w00t

 

1 nice effects work on text 8/10

2 bit bright but overal ncie i tihnk you should change the size of ur sigs to small

work on TEXT@@@@%#%

 

@latino
nice and unique, wouldnt have thought using pillars with Prince of persia good colors/bg to, alow of flow 9/10

2nd
Lots of flow, but a bit dull and the background needs stuff in it

 

uhm 7/10 for the 1st the color is a lil messy imo..

 

Very good sig like that style.

8/10 render is bad quality

8/10 dunnow what is missing :lol: