Rate The Sig Above You ..

Discussion in 'Graphics discussion' started by TheGrudge214, Jan 5, 2002.

Page 1507 of 3605
  1. Jan 7, 2006 at 3:48 PM #22591
    Leethal

    Leethal Well-Known Member

    Age:
    36
    Posts:
    2,869
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2005
    Location:
    SunnyDale
    PUMAS!

    6/10 The render doesn't match the background, and the text could be better.
     
  2. Jan 7, 2006 at 4:01 PM #22592
    Nightfire117

    Nightfire117 Guest

    not bad, i give you an 8/10, the sigs are nicely organized. however the first one seems to bright for Billie-Joe Armstrong :P and the second one is focused on... a girl's body. not the entire person. great job , keep it up!

    ~nightfire
     
  3. Jan 7, 2006 at 4:08 PM #22593
    Mika

    Mika Well-Known Member

    Age:
    36
    Posts:
    227
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    i like ur pop sig.. but not a fan of pop out sigs.. give the pop sig 7/10 and the other two 6/10
     
  4. Jan 7, 2006 at 4:19 PM #22594
    AcidGlow

    AcidGlow Well-Known Member

    Age:
    44
    Posts:
    2,944
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2005
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario. Canada.
    Right side feels empty. The text doesn't seem to fit either. hmm.
    6/10
     
  5. Jan 7, 2006 at 4:29 PM #22595
    iceak

    iceak Well-Known Member

    Age:
    34
    Posts:
    786
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2005
    Location:
    Norway
    AcidGlow

    10/10
    10/10

    <3
     
  6. Jan 7, 2006 at 4:41 PM #22596
    SM Ciel

    SM Ciel Well-Known Member

    Age:
    35
    Posts:
    3,646
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 25, 2005
    Location:
    USA
    mmmk its ok but kindda plain IMO
    5/10
     
  7. Jan 7, 2006 at 4:56 PM #22597
    eternalapoc

    eternalapoc Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    226
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2005
    ^

    7.0- <3 Domo Kun XD

    8.6/10- Nice effect and colors. Not bad text too.
     
  8. Jan 7, 2006 at 5:28 PM #22598
    Reizin

    Reizin Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    440
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2005
    1st: 6/10 - not feeling the smudging
    2nd: 8/10 - flows pretty well, nice colors
    3rd: 7/10 - not liking the colors too well :)
     
  9. Jan 7, 2006 at 5:33 PM #22599
    .Apocalypse

    .Apocalypse Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    4,494
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    6/10 the colors ruin it all for me
     
  10. Jan 7, 2006 at 5:36 PM #22600
    Nightfire117

    Nightfire117 Guest

    Apocolpyse:

    hehe i keep rating your sig. 6/10, nice job!

    ~nightfire
     
  11. Jan 7, 2006 at 5:47 PM #22601
    Fatal Threat

    Fatal Threat Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    489
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2005
    5/10 for all - Nightfire.
     
  12. Jan 7, 2006 at 5:48 PM #22602
    knivesofice

    knivesofice Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    292
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2005
    8.8 on all of them gj nice style
     
  13. Jan 7, 2006 at 5:53 PM #22603
    Nightfire117

    Nightfire117 Guest

    knivesofice:

    nice job, 8/10! i like your sigs - keep it up!

    ~nightfire
     
  14. Jan 7, 2006 at 5:56 PM #22604
    SweetVidel

    SweetVidel Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    241
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    1st - 6/10 good stock but bg and text is boring
    2nd - 7/10 good stock and Bg, text is quite good
    3rd - 7.7/10 love the stock and Bg is good , text is good
     
  15. Jan 7, 2006 at 6:09 PM #22605
    knivesofice

    knivesofice Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    292
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2005
    gj im thinkin a 8.7 on this one
     
Page 1507 of 3605

Share This Page