Rate The Sig Above You ..

Discussion in 'Graphics discussion' started by TheGrudge214, Jan 5, 2002.

  1. UV SlaYer_prk.

    UV SlaYer_prk. Senior Member

    Age:
    36
    Posts:
    3,314
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Location:
    Poland
    1:5/10
    2:7/10
     
  2. zero5

    zero5 Well-Known Member

    Age:
    37
    Posts:
    241
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2005
    10/10 as usual lol. Make a new sig using that style. I'll bet it'll look great. ^_^
     
  3. .Apocalypse

    .Apocalypse Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    4,494
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    6/10
    7/10

    top one looks bland and the bottem one could use better text
     
  4. Tonic

    Tonic Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,243
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2005
    Mmmm vector *drools* 9.5/10.
     
  5. eternalapoc

    eternalapoc Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    226
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2005
    ^

    8.2/10- Good smudging and render. The font could use more work. Not really my style of smudging =P

    8.0/10- Not bad smudge art.. just the right side is really empty and the text could have been elsewhere.
     
  6. SM Ciel

    SM Ciel Well-Known Member

    Age:
    35
    Posts:
    3,646
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 25, 2005
    Location:
    USA
    1 7/10 loks cool but not feling it
    2 8/10 looking cool i like the effect
    3 8/10 i like wats going on everything is nice
     
  7. UV SlaYer_prk.

    UV SlaYer_prk. Senior Member

    Age:
    36
    Posts:
    3,314
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Location:
    Poland
    7/10 overall, they look ok
     
  8. DeviousDave

    DeviousDave Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    91
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2005
    7/10 - not my style but a nice sig
     
  9. UV Double D

    UV Double D Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,501
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2005
    First one: 7/10 TOO MUCH CONTRASTED TEXT COULD BE BETTER!

    Second one: 7.5/10 nice blending!
    Double D
     
  10. TheNoob

    TheNoob Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    234
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2005
    urm 8.5-9/10 for both
    first one is cool except that render looks weird lol
     
  11. 001556

    001556 Member

    Posts:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2005
    good sigs both 8/10 kinda bland but good..dun really lyk border one first one
     
  12. AM M a r i n e

    AM M a r i n e Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    2,748
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Top, render needs to be bigger text needs to be worked on, so does border and coloring.
    3/10 read some tuts

    bottom, scanlines need to go or at least be faded. the rest is ok
    5/10
     
  13. Psygnosis

    Psygnosis Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    76
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    4/10 Whats that?
    6/10
     
  14. UV SlaYer_prk.

    UV SlaYer_prk. Senior Member

    Age:
    36
    Posts:
    3,314
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Location:
    Poland
    so... it's too big for me, text looks bad and bg is not fit with render

    3/10, sry

    please rate my current and these 2:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  15. -Xe-

    -Xe- Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    663
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    slayer

    1st: 8/10 too dark imo, rest is good
    2nd 9/10 but again, you need to improve lighting
    current: 8/.5/10 seems mono in a way...love the text though
     

Share This Page