JUDGES MAY VOTE HERE NOW KingBlood: Original: Not given. Rendered: Dooks: Original: http://wow.pimpbunnies.com/pics/wallpapers/lich-1024x.jpg Rendered:
I'd go for dooks looks good and smooth it flows well also.less useable though king blood yours is a bit rough and not so smooth.but good render but less useable than dooks itself.
WOW! i saw KingBlood's render and i thought, "wow. this one gets MY vote!" Then, i scrolled down and saw Dooks' render. It's a tough decision. lol :lol: KingBlood VERY nice cut, flawless, i should say - especially around the helmet and "plume" (sp?) The overall usability is great, perfect for signatures as well as larger images - even wallpapers, since the size is nice and large. Dooks The cut is amazing. Definetly better than KingBlood's render - there are a lot of wonderfully executed curves in this render! This ghostly image is not exactly useful for practical purposes, however, and it's quite small. Overall my choice is KingBlood, good job! Happy New Year! ~Nightfire
Tough Decision... KingBlood: Very good it might of been easier if you provided an original img. There aren't any faults that I can see in the render and Knight renders are hard to come by now adays(unless you want to use the search tool). So it is unique and I haven't seen that render around before. Dooks: Another premium render. This render is kind of common now adays because of the popularity of World of Warcraft. Its a good cut you cut out everything quite well actually making my choice even more difficult. My vote goes toward KingBlood because it is more unique then Dooks render. If it wasn't for that reason I would be thinking about it for awhile.
KingBlood: It is hard to say how difficult this render is because we dont have original !! But its a great size, nice clean cut all the way around, And it is very usable !! Dooks: This must on been extremly hard to render with the black and all, great cut clean all the way around, great size, usable in a sig. I vote for Dooks
dooks gmv also its clean original and a decent size kingbloods is also good but i feel there are so many renders of this type nice size lil ruff in places but still overall good
Kazuya agreed on me being a temporary judge. Everything is explained from my point of view, so If I am referring to right or left-side, it will be our right or left. KingBlood 1st thought - Cool picture! Mistakes - a lot of black lines, either choose with or without them, not both - Very choppy around the shield, helmet and sword Positive - Good size, good for use on dark-backgrounds Negative - Bad looking on light backgrounds Dooks: 1st thought - An even cooler picture! Mistakes - Cut-off parts of the bottom-side of the robe/dress - Not sure, but it seems that the inner part of the torso is missing - Choppy parts on the “hair” Positive - Clean cut - Very nice work on the glow from the stick and eyes (on dark background) Negative - Glow isn’t translucent My vote goes to Dooks, his render looks very good, and very clean. It also has a good size. if you a better explanation containing pictures, please pm me, and add link to original, render and my own comment.
Both renders are well cut and the quality is good Kingblood : the render is well cut the quality is very good and the size makes it usable in a variety of things, sigs, banners or wall papers Dooks : very unique render, well cut but of a smaller size then the other. I think it is still usable but it would be more difficult than the other render and could be used only in sigs or wallpappers. Kingblood gets my vote because his render is very usable well cut and of a good size.
When comparing the two renders in this battle, both renders are very good, but it comes down to the simple question, would someone use it? Kingblood's render is larger & more detailed; giving it the ability to be used in wallpapers, signatures, banners, or splashes. Kingblood GMV, 6-4
