Rate The Sig Above You ..

Discussion in 'Graphics discussion' started by TheGrudge214, Jan 5, 2002.

  1. slacker

    slacker Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    307
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2005
    both deserve a 7.5/10, nice job on both, lighting looks good just the text i guess is a lil out of wack lol.
     
  2. .Atlas

    .Atlas Well-Known Member

    Age:
    34
    Posts:
    826
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2005
    both are 9/10 the only thing i can say is fix the text on the second and to work on lighting it would look better if it was darker and the majority light came from the one area where it looks like an explosion but still nice work.
     
  3. Alph-

    Alph- Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    881
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    8/10
    the bg is really! really good
     
  4. slacker

    slacker Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    307
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2005
     
  5. Alph-

    Alph- Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    881
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    8.5/10 for the 2nd the bg is really nice
     
  6. AM M a r i n e

    AM M a r i n e Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    2,748
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Top.
    Render needs some blending and the text is a little boring. Rest is great.
    - 8/10

    Bottom.
    Not feeling the lighting at all, maybe use a gradient and ahve it fade out at the bottom. I dont like the render and the right side needs blending, bg doesnt work to well with the rest of the sig and the render takes up to much space. I like the text effects and everything, but the colors are off imo.
    - 6/10
     
  7. .Atlas

    .Atlas Well-Known Member

    Age:
    34
    Posts:
    826
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2005
    8.5/10 i liked the way u did the text in the other version
     
  8. -QuickSilver-

    -QuickSilver- Senior Member

    Posts:
    3,210
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    it's pretty good but you need to improce your techniques a bit, then it will turn out very nice!!

    8/10 overall.
     
  9. UV SlaYer_prk.

    UV SlaYer_prk. Senior Member

    Age:
    36
    Posts:
    3,314
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Location:
    Poland
    8/10 i like it :)
     
  10. -QuickSilver-

    -QuickSilver- Senior Member

    Posts:
    3,210
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    7/10, dont really like this one.. it's to standard looks just a motion blur in the background.. text is fine tho

    thinkyou followed schleprok tutorial.. am i right?
     
  11. AM M a r i n e

    AM M a r i n e Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    2,748
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    a little monotone, but good.
    8/10
     
  12. UV SlaYer_prk.

    UV SlaYer_prk. Senior Member

    Age:
    36
    Posts:
    3,314
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Location:
    Poland
    no i don't, hmm yeah bg is motion blur and some other filters ;> :)
     
  13. AM M a r i n e

    AM M a r i n e Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    2,748
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    didnt rate mine :( anyways, i like and i commented on the thread
     
  14. Nicasus

    Nicasus Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    4,808
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2005
    Location:
    Somewhere
    I like abstract, so: [8 / 10]


    Nice, I like the colors to :)


    Edit for the next person who's gonna rate my sig: Yeah, my sig is plain, I know, I wanna have an easy sig :P
     
  15. Alph-

    Alph- Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    881
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    6.5/10
    nothing special =/
     

Share This Page