I play CS Source ATM. I kind of like 1.6 better because the game play runs a lot smoother, I'm not talking in lag sense either. Just source has a lot of bugs and IMO I think CS Source was to hit the market. But since I bought HL2 just for CSS, I might as well as play it. I'm hoping to get a server of my own up soon. I got a Christian gaming community and started so I want to make it grow.
The ones who don't like games that play on the same map (de dust), same weapons, same teams... so basically..I'm one of them that doesn't like CS. [/b][/quote] lmao counter strike definatley has the most variety of weapons and maps. including when people are always creating new ones. me 1.6 > CSS im ex cal m s13
css is my favorite game i just love it. and its even better when your amazing at it and like cant die
Some people say 1.6 is better because in source the hitboxs are messed up it seems. Where you can awp there leg clearly and get a headshot. Most people who complain about source and say it sucks usually you will find cant play it due to their computer. I currently play 1.6 and source. My cal team is only in o but we were 5-3 which isnt bad for a new team in my opinion. In source we plan on entering ogl and then cal to see how we do. We have 2 servers 1 for 1.6 and one for source. They are both great games in my opinion. The rag doll effect in source is great lol. Anyone looking for a clan?
the reason why i hate source is because its not counter strike. 1,6 and below has its reputation of having the wall glitches and spams and if your shots registers or not and the good feeling of getting 3 headshots when spraying. for me source doesnt provide any of that. there are no wall spams the recoil is much easier, and shots always register i have more fun when i play 1.6. but dont get me wrong source's graphics are very nice. the rag doll effect is a plus. but to me its not cs anymore its just another fps
there is only one prb with it and that is the amount of hit your opponent takes if they have damn lag
