**discussion Thread**

just wanted to see what you guys thought of mine.

 

ahh i had a good photomanipulation but i dont have 200 posts Good luck all.
Go Renegade!\
Anywho if i had 200 post i would enter my first photomanip:

 

no offence but most of the n3's suck so far ....maybe 1 or 2 good ones..

 

sounds good, ill join in a few weeks, but im still not good

 

u guys suck!............................... :censored:

 

but Apoc. if u add additional render to your photomanip its called a sig.. see?

 

no..you people really need to get over yourselfs. technically every sig is a photo munip unless the render and background was all drawn together. meaning you didnt cut a render out of a picture. meaning you made that render yourself for that sig alone. then its a sig sig. otherwise its considered a photo munipulation. because you took that render from one photo. and stuck it in another. so technically any sig entered other than ones that are handmade are technically photo-munipulations.

 

this is a photomanip:

this is NOT a photomanip:

render was manipulated but the bg is not a PHOTO
that was just a render manipulation
hopefully that clears it for some

 

i dont stand a chance i already know who is going to win

 

no not really. its considered a photo munip because the render may not be on its main picture. but none the less its part of another picture. mearly added to another b/g meaning you munipulated that render. meaning you munipulated the the photo by giving it a new background...

 

great theme should make more like this but have sub themes in the theme like photmanipulations sigs of famous places and so on...

 

no not really. its considered a photo munip because the render may not be on its main picture. but none the less its part of another picture. mearly added to another b/g meaning you munipulated that render. meaning you munipulated the the photo by giving it a new background... [/b][/quote]
i must disagree
that is just a sig
only because the render was manipulated it doesnt mean it is a PHOTOmanipulation
it has to be a full picture to be manipulated to be considered that
the only thing i manipulated was the render and the bg was made by me
it has to have an original full picture to be considered a PHOTOmanip
what you are talking about is just a regular manipulation

 

Hellknight's correct. I don't see how you could believe otherwise. It's called a PHOTOmanip because it includes a PHOTOGRAPH, simple concept.

 

so your saying that if infact i took a wallpaper that had the render on it.and added brushing so that it didnt even appeal as the original and then shrunk it down to sig size it would be a photo munip? but if i removed the render and added it to a canvas and brushed in an abstract manner until i made somthing appealing to me. that it would be considered a sig? im very confused on this matter.

 

yeah thats correct thats what im trying to say..

some people added a bg and totally brushed over it not noticable an added a render or 2.. thats a sig.. no doubt