The biggest question is this: Has the acting improved since the first movie? The first Saw was shot in like 3 weeks from what I heard, and so was this one. However, the acting on the first movie was horrible, regardless of any good plot twists it might have had (I did think the plot and the twist at the end were awesome, btw). But, the horrible acting detracted A LOT from the actual worth of the movie... So, is the acting any better the second time around?
i saw this yesterday... IT is amazing. to the original 3 question the answer is yes. Acting is better... you don't need longer than 3 weeks to shoot this film if you have your set built because its only in a few buildings they need to worry about. loved it very scary and thrilling yet quite sickening lol. I would recommend to anyone that has seen the original even though people i went with hadn't seen the first, they still understood the plot.
Hah, im probably going to go see it again.. Seriously. No exaduration, the movie is insanely awesome.
gonna watch this sometime dunno when though...seems like it is a really good movie...cant wait to watch it
OMG dude. I want to see this movie so bad, now that you said it was awesome. I can't even wait. OMFG. Thanks for this.
1) Is it better than the first? I Havent seen it yet! 2) Is the ending as good as the first? The first movies ending was just weird... 3) Will there be Saw III. Most definately