*bump* :o
Thanks for the comments, and for the comment posting the colored version... The main reason I went B&W is because the colored version was icky, lol.
x2 lol. I agree with v1 being the best if you would reduce the noise a bit as it makes your image look a bit low quality.
I like the concept and the sig, but the bottom one is a bit oversharpened, and I dislike the blur you have on the purple squiggly on the first...
Some of my better/recent sigs: [img] [img] [img] [img] (If you can try to ignore the text on that one >_>) [img] (dont like this one so much, but...
Haven't made a signature since probably close to September '08, and I decided I would try to win the SOTW this week. I probably won't enter this...
Cool, this is the first time I've ever placed :) , thanks to everyone, and congrats to all the other winners.
[img] Sib:[img]
Yeah I used a topaz 30 day trial once, just to have like a 3 week trip afterwards. But I cleaned up my Mr.Incredible sig with that program, it's...
I added another version with text, I think it doesn't disrupt the theme as much as I thought it would.
It is really nice, I would say it's alot better than your currents also. Only things I would suggest is to tone down the lighting, lose the text,...
I was originally making this signature for the SOTW, but I couldn't find a good way to put my name on it without ruining the theme of the sig, so...
Separate names with a comma.